Difference between revisions of "Talk:School subjects"

From Missouri Academy Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 12: Line 12:
  
  
Stu, that's a terribly unhelpful link, as it refers to "attached" documentation, and there's nothing really in it.
+
Stu, that's a terribly unhelpful link, as it refers to "attached" documentation, and there's nothing really in it. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]]

Revision as of 03:17, 30 December 2004

Let's see if we can get this page to be about classes in general, and which ones are required. Then we can link to other pages that have information on specific classes . -- Andy 20:01, 24 Dec 2004 (EST)

Alright, check the CS pages for the format I've started them in. I suppose it doesn't matter if we're consistent, but either way... ~Chrax
yea, im not exactly sure how they work, but we should try to get them catagorized as well, like all of them in school subjects, and then math in a math catagory and such Andy 21:29, 24 Dec 2004 (EST)
I can't see any way that an extra math (or any subject, but math as an example) page would do anything but add clutter. Since each page (as I envision them) will have an official description as well as an academite's description of the class, there's not much need for a commentary page. However it might be nice to have the math teachers and math classes all on one page. Perhaps the teachers page and class page ideas weren't the best way of approaching this. We can always get it how we want it and then remove old pages that don't fit in. ~Chrax
What did you do to my description of chemistry!!! --Squishypickle 22:38, 24 Dec 2004 (EST)
I put it back. I don't think it belongs there, but I'll let you deal with that. I'm tired of this for tonight. ~Chrax
Youre dumb. My description clearly describes what you do in chemistry: write letters with lines connecting them. And dots.


Stu, that's a terribly unhelpful link, as it refers to "attached" documentation, and there's nothing really in it. -Chrax