Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bringing in Users"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Stu makes a good point: This fucker's been up for about 4 days. Let's put this stuff on hold until... maybe a week after we go back, and then we can decide whether or not it's getting decent exposure. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | Stu makes a good point: This fucker's been up for about 4 days. Let's put this stuff on hold until... maybe a week after we go back, and then we can decide whether or not it's getting decent exposure. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | ||
:So I'm going to remove the link from the front page. It's a bit early to be worrying about this. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | :So I'm going to remove the link from the front page. It's a bit early to be worrying about this. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | ||
| + | ::Understood - [[User:Mpnolan|Mpnolan]] 23:26, 26 Dec 2004 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 04:26, 27 December 2004
Yes... we definitely need more users. We could send out a Acad wide email - Stuey
- I don't think we need such agressive methods. Personally I would be annoyed and potentially turned off to the idea by such tactics. -Chrax
- I think more people will go to it. It hasn't bee up long. - Stuey
- An Academy wide mail is a bad idea. If I get one of those I'm going to become a troll. Just so you guys know. -goofyheadedpunk
- I think more people will go to it. It hasn't bee up long. - Stuey
- I'll become a notorious mime. -Squishypickle
Stu makes a good point: This fucker's been up for about 4 days. Let's put this stuff on hold until... maybe a week after we go back, and then we can decide whether or not it's getting decent exposure. -Chrax
