Difference between revisions of "Talk:Academy Movie Exchange"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::::Intra makes sense. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | :::::Intra makes sense. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | ||
::::::Yes, but how do we spell the title? -[[User:Goofyheadedpunk|Goofyheadedpunk]] | ::::::Yes, but how do we spell the title? -[[User:Goofyheadedpunk|Goofyheadedpunk]] | ||
| + | :::::::Ah. I would think intra-academy. Or we could just leave it as Academy with no prefix. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | ||
Revision as of 20:42, 26 December 2004
I think the idea of restricting access to rarely used objects is dumb. This exchange idea should be extended to all kinds of media: CDs, video games, etc. Pretty much any type of categorizable object works. If it's successful, we can set up a database. - Mpnolan 06:10, 26 Dec 2004 (EST)
- Interesting idea... should we put ratings of movies? - Stuey
- Should it be "intraacademy?" -Squishypickle
- Ooohhh... He got you there! - Stuey
- It should be intra-academy(ish). We should decided on a spelling and then move the article. -Goofyheadedpunk
- Intra makes sense. -Chrax
- Yes, but how do we spell the title? -Goofyheadedpunk
- Ah. I would think intra-academy. Or we could just leave it as Academy with no prefix. -Chrax
- Yes, but how do we spell the title? -Goofyheadedpunk
- Intra makes sense. -Chrax
- It should be intra-academy(ish). We should decided on a spelling and then move the article. -Goofyheadedpunk
