Difference between revisions of "Mr. Smith"
(New page: ==Classes taught== Introduction to American Government and Politics (34-102) ==Style & personality== ==Student opinions== Category:Professors) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | '''Daniel Smith''' is a political science professor and the husband of the Academy's Secretary for Academic Affairs and Student Development [[Susan Smith]]. | ||
+ | |||
==Classes taught== | ==Classes taught== | ||
[[American Government|Introduction to American Government and Politics]] (34-102) | [[American Government|Introduction to American Government and Politics]] (34-102) | ||
+ | |||
==Style & personality== | ==Style & personality== | ||
+ | Mr. Smith's personal interest is the judiciary. As such, his version of 34-102 focuses proportionally more on civil rights, civil liberties, and the decisions rendered by the United States Supreme Court. His exams will often present a situation about which you will have to discuss the relevant civil rights (e.g.: Police chase a fleeing suspect into a house and while in pursuit they find that the house is being used to grow a large number of cannabis plants. Are the police allowed to press charges against the homeowner for being a marijuana supplier?). | ||
==Student opinions== | ==Student opinions== |
Latest revision as of 23:59, 2 May 2010
Daniel Smith is a political science professor and the husband of the Academy's Secretary for Academic Affairs and Student Development Susan Smith.
Classes taught[edit]
Introduction to American Government and Politics (34-102)
Style & personality[edit]
Mr. Smith's personal interest is the judiciary. As such, his version of 34-102 focuses proportionally more on civil rights, civil liberties, and the decisions rendered by the United States Supreme Court. His exams will often present a situation about which you will have to discuss the relevant civil rights (e.g.: Police chase a fleeing suspect into a house and while in pursuit they find that the house is being used to grow a large number of cannabis plants. Are the police allowed to press charges against the homeowner for being a marijuana supplier?).