Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kenzie"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | This stuff belongs on the user page, so I moved it for you. This page is for discussions. -[[User:Squishypickle|Squishypickle]] | ||
| − | + | I sent you a gmail invite, in case you're wondering who it's from. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | |
| − | + | Hey Mackenzie--welcome to the Wiki :). - [[User:Mpnolan|Mpnolan]] 04:02, 2 Apr 2005 (EST) | |
| − | + | You might want to change <nowiki>[[Voyager]] to [[Voyagers|Voyager]]</nowiki>, I would do it, but it's you're user page --[[User:137.112.142.143|137.112.142.143]] 20:49, 18 Sep 2005 (EDT) | |
| − | + | ===Your recent edits=== | |
| − | + | I noticed a couple of your recent edits - the Sam and Lisa pages. It's good you made them, but I'd go for more timeless descriptions. Don't talk about you or your wing's opinions, or if you must, make it clear you're talking about 4W (?) of 2006. Ask: Will someone reading in 2015 be able to understand this? - [[User:Mpnolan|Mpnolan]] 19:44, 9 Apr 2006 (EDT) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | == | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 23:44, 9 April 2006
This stuff belongs on the user page, so I moved it for you. This page is for discussions. -Squishypickle
I sent you a gmail invite, in case you're wondering who it's from. -Chrax
Hey Mackenzie--welcome to the Wiki :). - Mpnolan 04:02, 2 Apr 2005 (EST)
You might want to change [[Voyager]] to [[Voyagers|Voyager]], I would do it, but it's you're user page --137.112.142.143 20:49, 18 Sep 2005 (EDT)
Your recent edits[edit]
I noticed a couple of your recent edits - the Sam and Lisa pages. It's good you made them, but I'd go for more timeless descriptions. Don't talk about you or your wing's opinions, or if you must, make it clear you're talking about 4W (?) of 2006. Ask: Will someone reading in 2015 be able to understand this? - Mpnolan 19:44, 9 Apr 2006 (EDT)
