Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pathfinders"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:No, but he sent me an email saying he wanted to be completely removed. Must be a communist sympathizer or something. -[[User:Squishypickle|Squishypickle]] | :No, but he sent me an email saying he wanted to be completely removed. Must be a communist sympathizer or something. -[[User:Squishypickle|Squishypickle]] | ||
::Should we put something at the bottom about it not being a complete list? -[[User:Andy|Andy]] | ::Should we put something at the bottom about it not being a complete list? -[[User:Andy|Andy]] | ||
| + | :::Yeah, I'll do that. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | ||
| + | ::Or just a paranoid fuck. You know whatever. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | ||
:Maybe he didn't want to have any identifying information available on the Internet. Whatever the reason, I think it was within his rights. - [[User:Mpnolan|Mpnolan]] 16:51, 25 Dec 2005 (EST) | :Maybe he didn't want to have any identifying information available on the Internet. Whatever the reason, I think it was within his rights. - [[User:Mpnolan|Mpnolan]] 16:51, 25 Dec 2005 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Within his rights yes, but we weren't giving out email addresses or anything. Just a list of names for historical purposes. I don't see the threat to his privacy. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | ||
Revision as of 22:47, 27 December 2005
I don't understand why we ought to remove a person's name. Was any reason given? -Chrax
- No, but he sent me an email saying he wanted to be completely removed. Must be a communist sympathizer or something. -Squishypickle
- Maybe he didn't want to have any identifying information available on the Internet. Whatever the reason, I think it was within his rights. - Mpnolan 16:51, 25 Dec 2005 (EST)
- Within his rights yes, but we weren't giving out email addresses or anything. Just a list of names for historical purposes. I don't see the threat to his privacy. -Chrax
