Difference between revisions of "Talk:Oral Communication"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sillyputty (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:i think dr. fisher was one of the better teachers if only for giving us all the answers to the final (in essense) right before we took it. -[[User:Sillyputty|Sillyputty]] | :i think dr. fisher was one of the better teachers if only for giving us all the answers to the final (in essense) right before we took it. -[[User:Sillyputty|Sillyputty]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hats off to whoever wrote this. I came here to channel my anger about this class—intending to complain especially about the definition-based midterms and "form over content" speeches—but Chris (?) covered that remarkably. - [[User:Mpnolan|Mpnolan]] 20:06, 1 Dec 2005 (EST) | ||
| + | :It sounds like something I'd write. Mmm vitriol. -[[User:Chrax|Chrax]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:34, 4 December 2005
This class is terrible...most of it doesnt really help enhance your communication skills at all.--Squishypickle 22:29, 25 Dec 2004 (EST)
- The Monrow Motivated Sequence raped my Mother and killed my Father... by raping him to death. -Goofyheadedpunk
- i think dr. fisher was one of the better teachers if only for giving us all the answers to the final (in essense) right before we took it. -Sillyputty
Hats off to whoever wrote this. I came here to channel my anger about this class—intending to complain especially about the definition-based midterms and "form over content" speeches—but Chris (?) covered that remarkably. - Mpnolan 20:06, 1 Dec 2005 (EST)
- It sounds like something I'd write. Mmm vitriol. -Chrax
