Difference between revisions of "Carol Spradling"
m |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Student opinions== | ==Student opinions== | ||
AMAZING WOMAN! Goes super slow so it's nearly impossible to get behind. Always eager to answer questions. Fun woman, even one-on-one. Sometimes she goes so slow it's hard to stay awake. Powerpoints teach and give examples. Best study material in the world. Study decently for tests, and you'll do just fine. | AMAZING WOMAN! Goes super slow so it's nearly impossible to get behind. Always eager to answer questions. Fun woman, even one-on-one. Sometimes she goes so slow it's hard to stay awake. Powerpoints teach and give examples. Best study material in the world. Study decently for tests, and you'll do just fine. | ||
| + | |||
| + | David Gorham-Ugh. Not only is she the worst teacher I've had at the Academy, she's the worst teacher I've ever had. Instead of say, teaching, she tries a radical new approach: reading notes that she hasn't read before, let alone understand. On top of all that, she's quite condescending, and treats her students as if they were retarded sea monkeys. Her coup de' grat: Her tests, which are supposed to focus on understanding the mindset and actions of programming, are done on paper. As such, the majority of points lost are due to simple formatting errors, that would've easily been caught and fixed had the exam been on a computer. Class is easy, but you won't gain any knowledge. | ||
[[Category:Professors]] | [[Category:Professors]] | ||
Revision as of 01:49, 25 November 2005
Classes taught
Style & personality
Student opinions
AMAZING WOMAN! Goes super slow so it's nearly impossible to get behind. Always eager to answer questions. Fun woman, even one-on-one. Sometimes she goes so slow it's hard to stay awake. Powerpoints teach and give examples. Best study material in the world. Study decently for tests, and you'll do just fine.
David Gorham-Ugh. Not only is she the worst teacher I've had at the Academy, she's the worst teacher I've ever had. Instead of say, teaching, she tries a radical new approach: reading notes that she hasn't read before, let alone understand. On top of all that, she's quite condescending, and treats her students as if they were retarded sea monkeys. Her coup de' grat: Her tests, which are supposed to focus on understanding the mindset and actions of programming, are done on paper. As such, the majority of points lost are due to simple formatting errors, that would've easily been caught and fixed had the exam been on a computer. Class is easy, but you won't gain any knowledge.
